Progress - &- Improvement

It just make me think of getting an un-improvement loan.

Anyway, most people will go for one or the other or both.
Yet the main philosophical difference between liberal and
conservative is in the above distinction.  That notion
immediately makes you think about, why this distinction
between improvement and progress can create such a
high level of dissension , distress, disagreement and so forth.

Curious how things work out.

Observing this it seems pretty darn clear that if we choose
one " powerful " individual in our community then the highest
priority for him/her  needs to be resolving that un-believably
ridiculous conflict, and therefore should be elected in such a
way that his/her connection with one of these questionable
political distinctions we refer to as parties does not effectively
destroy our system of self governance.  Therefore, the
decision to engage in such a form of election must
also be made in a non-political way.

One other thing also seems evident  in that we need to
reassess significantly our notion of economics, in
that currently if we discuss this topic using some
particular words, it immediately causes out rage.
This seriously inhibits our ability to discuss these
important collective ideas as well as collective behaviors.

If a particular word connected to a particular concept
is of such collective concern then the whole structure
and notion needs to be clearly examined.


All that  seems impossible, but I think I do need to speak
to my bank about one very large  un-improvement loan,
as soon as possible.