Thursday, September 8, 2016
Blow Hardiness Part 2 and the Neo revolution
Well, as I mentioned, I really felt like I needed to abandon this blog, because of the high
level of blow hardiness connected with this topic. Unfortunately, I have because aware
of " new " information related to U.S. system of politics and because of which I must
cast doubt on all the arguments in this blog. ( RATS !!!! )
The problem seems to be the use of terms liberal and conservative, which previously I
believed made up the --- fundamental --- dividing lines in our system. But I have
become aware now that these groupings or collections no longer exist, because all
the liberals and conservatives jumped ship and are now neo-liberals and
neo-conservatives and there is no longer a direct connection between neo-liberals
and liberals or neo-conservatives and conservatives. In other words our political
system has grown considerably more opaque.
I am guessing that this terminology derives itself from the lead character Neo from the
Matrix series, but as to that, there may not be a direct connection ----- however, I need
more concrete examples. So, what would be the difference between a neo-apricot and
an apricot, or what is the difference between a neo-apple and a regular apple? Like
consider a neo-wheel versus a wheel or what is a neo-straight line as compared to
straight line? Do two neo-straight lines that are parallel meet at a single point or never?
Is there now a new concept of neo-parallelism applied to a relationship between lines?
Is there a connection between the neo version of something and say a virtual element
of the same type? Will we eventually have neo-cows and neo-chairs, neo-sidewalks and
neo-roads?
So these are obviously important questions, and beyond reaches the vast need for the
American public to be thoroughly educated on this topic, both a necessity and
an enormous task. For example, why did all the conservatives jump ship and
become neo-conservatives, and likewise why did the liberals all jump ship
and become neo-liberals? Was it a natural process, some biological agent or virus,
or is it simply a product of poor sleeping habits in the American public? Could it
be connected in some way to erroneous astronomical observations?
One question that does concern me is if there is actually a difference between
the two or is it totally subjective?
And even more, if you needed a liberal now a days or a conservative ? perhaps for
historical reasons, where would you go to find one?
This titanic issue almost makes the issue of blow hardiness seem to pale in comparison.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)