Progress - &- Improvement

It just make me think of getting an un-improvement loan.

Anyway, most people will go for one or the other or both.
Yet the main philosophical difference between liberal and
conservative is in the above distinction.  That notion
immediately makes you think about, why this distinction
between improvement and progress can create such a
high level of dissension , distress, disagreement and so forth.

Curious how things work out.

Observing this it seems pretty darn clear that if we choose
one " powerful " individual in our community then the highest
priority for him/her  needs to be resolving that un-believably
ridiculous conflict, and therefore should be elected in such a
way that his/her connection with one of these questionable
political distinctions we refer to as parties does not effectively
destroy our system of self governance.  Therefore, the
decision to engage in such a form of election must
also be made in a non-political way.

One other thing also seems evident  in that we need to
reassess significantly our notion of economics, in
that currently if we discuss this topic using some
particular words, it immediately causes out rage.
This seriously inhibits our ability to discuss these
important collective ideas as well as collective behaviors.

If a particular word connected to a particular concept
is of such collective concern then the whole structure
and notion needs to be clearly examined.


All that  seems impossible, but I think I do need to speak
to my bank about one very large  un-improvement loan,
as soon as possible.

Digression: Isomphorism

So apparently this is more beating around the bush for
no apparent reason, but this is an interesting idea which
not everyone is completely conversant, or perhaps
some small number.  Perhaps no one is completely
conversant with it.

Anyway mathematics contains a notion of equality.
The founding father's of the USA also had some
idea like that in mind.  Now as to the reality of
equality, well, we have a very large number of
examples of that, because ,,, everything is in fact
equal to itself.

But that brings up the notion of .. itself, because,
clearly, if you consider an individual, say mammal,
well, it's made up of a whole pile of atoms, some
of which are indistinguishable from another individual,
and so the whole notion of what makes an individual thing
can be confusing.

Well, isomorhism is a bit more sophisticated in that some
thing might be the same as some other thing but appear to be
different.  This is quite a notion, and certainly can give your
head a scratch.

Anyway, I believe that if you are not familiar with the
word, you have some familiarity with the idea, as it
also appears to us in regular life in various ways, so
although you may have not specifically thought about
it, or scratched your head over it, you probably
have some intuition about it.

Why, am I writing about this?  It's a digression, following
an interlude.  Any more questions?