Why we have different kinds of shoes

As mentioned in another blog IPH,

I am currently working on a poem with lots of G's in it.
Two of course are google and googol,,, an outstanding
pair of G's.  But also, must feature prominently, Kurt Godel,
a prominent figures in the development and advancement
of thought in the world, of the 20th century.

So, about shoes, well that's about left and right on a global scale,
and why it is that we have both left and right feet.  And to answer,
the question about feet,  is not all that easy, but I will just say, that
if something is not bad,  that doesn't always make it good, and
likewise, when something is not good, doesn't always make it bad.
Some might disagree on this view, but be patient for what comes
next.

So, it is appropriate to mention on his passing  Fidel Castro  as, he
was involved in shaping some of that dichotomous thinking during
the late twentieth century.  Or in other words if it's not right it's left.

As I also have mentioned else where, many people like to think in
terms of the proton, neutron world , which science now has
demonstrated  exists only at a some level of  physical reality, but
is not the whole story.  Likewise for capital and labor and similar
dichotomous concepts which only give us a fair approximation
of events that occur around us.   But knowing the deeper story,
that in fact both neutrons and protons are composed of quarks
gives us a deeper understanding and a more valid understanding
of the true nature of physical reality.  This is in the genuine spirit
of the development of quantum theory and the concept of
superposition and principle, in that things can exist in a
state of dynamic and indeterminate  change.


So back to feet.

It is important for us to reflect and understand that we all have two
feet and that the reason why the conflict between left and right
is intractable is that the conflict does not really exist.  It is
simply a conflict that take place with in all of us all the time,
constantly.

You can not predetermine in which direction you will go at
any time.  You have to make that decision at a unique time,
with considerations for many variables.

Finally all this reminds me a lot of To Kill a Mockingbird,,,
a book published right around the time Cuba , U.S. relations
were to feature prominently on the global stage.

Maybe yes, maybe no, I'm not sure ..... you know ...

So for right now I do know,,,,

Jackson Browne Standing Rock,, if today is Thanksgiving,,,
also,  Jane Fonda . Jackson Browne I believe performs Sunday,
Nov. 27, 2016

So, very soon Donald Trump will become, as per U.S. tradition,
over a long period of time,  the number one servant of the
American people,  and therefore, by tradition of the american people,
who consider themselves to be the servants of all the people of the world,,,
the number one servant of all the world.

But to serve the American people, the people of this nation,  he must serve
all the people of this nation.  Other wise, he is not doing what by
the traditions of this nation, we have elected him to do.  And if he is
unaware of those long held traditions,,, maybe some research or assistance
in that would be of order.

Now,  of course we do know that,,,,,,the history of this nation has been mostly
about dithering with the notion of who are the people of this nation, and we
are of course continuing to dither and muddle and muddle and dither on that
topic,,,,as well as how we as a nation are best able to serve all the other
nations of the world and by that I am not referring to Twilight zone episode
about how to serve mankind ( the cook book ),,,but what is the best way
to do that,,,, and for most of the 20 th century it was continuous violence,,,
but now that we are reaching the quarter point of the 21 st century, I am
thinking that, since it really didn't go so well in the  20 th century, a good
rethink might be in order, for us as a nation, Giving Thanks,,, today, after
Turkey ?

About civic action and bipartisanship

It could be a song, my bipartisan ship,,,

Now I must reference another blog concerning unique states,
because even in the situation where you have two large
groups, of distinct perspectives, all those perspectives which
are unique though there may be some forces of entanglement.

So to start out I have to admit why I don't like using this
blog, because on the subject I am discussing it's super easy
to fall off the cliff, one side or the other and land in " partisan "
world,  in that it is possible and easy for you to " take sides " ,
in what I believe turns into a lot of non-productive behaviors,
previously mentioned here.

But my main point is that ( in my opinion ) for our society to
progress, evolve and perfect (become 'great'), for us to become
better, it is necessary have collective behavior which is focused on
achieving goals relating to resolving or eliminating social
problems or improving social, community conditions in some
way,   and I believe personally that there are many outlets
for this  process, and many ways this process can be achieved,
and if we actually do imagine that all these solutions belong
to, or are the property of one single group I think that would be
more of a product of the imagination, than a effective way
of finding solutions and achieving goals.

So finally, when ever you have these groups,   like lets say
two main groups,  you generally have another group which
is the  ---->  I don't care, I don't know, and not important to
me ,,, group which I think is about the same size as the
other two,,,,

Yes, for all that, I am well aware that you should not conclude
a thought with a string of commas ,   but that's the kind of
person I am.