Where is the money?

Following on from the last post, one of the best reasons to develop such
a system of elections is the issue of money.

Under this concept the money would arrive only to one organization
which would be a co-operative process between all parties
to keep track of the money and to dispense the money
to the candidates.  This model would create a basis in a practical
sense for co-operation between all parties to try to get the best
person for what is an increasingly difficult but non-the-less important
role.  A role which will be more effective if there is broad support
for the individual elected.

The basic idea is that each individual will receive money based on
contributions to the organization to elect the president for the
individual candidate, but the nature of the organization would
create a higher degree of integrity based on the co-operation
between all parties, and more sense of trust, as well, about those
actions that are going on within the organization.

So this would be a great example for co-operation outside of the
formal government which should translate as an example to
the formal government itself.

Now obviously if a democrat, or republican is elected you would
expect some republican or democrat behaviors, but really idea is
to " tone " that aspect of the office way down. Rabbits .....