And stuff, more bipartisan president

Now I just discover the following correlation between liberal
and conservatives via which comic books they like:

liberal-or-conservative vs marval/dc-readers--1512365

In a perfect world, of course, nothing from the D.C. universe
is capable of penetrating the Marvel universe, most likely
on account of the large amount of dark matter which separates
them, or maybe it has something to do with the speed of
light in a vacuum?

But that is only a digression, I just want to make a few comments
about a bipartisan election of a president, which does make sense
to me.

First there needs to be local organizations with a desire to improve the
election of presidents, that I think would also be locally focused on
getting more people connected to the voting process.  These
organizations would have representatives from all local parties.

The area in terms of local would need to be large enough to
to have multi-parties.

Now if you look at the previous election of 2016,   essentially all
the candidates of all the parties,  mainly republican, democrat,
libertarian and green would all run together and be voted on
at each primary election, so that at the end you would have the
two most popular candidates running opposed to each other.

In this way, by the end, even though there would be a winner
take all final election,  by the end, the issue of republican
versus democrat would be greatly diminished and there would
also be necessarily a co-operation among parties at the
local level in-order to develop and support this kind of
a multi-party presidency.   But most important as the organization
which most directly supports the president, it would also
have a responsibility to ensure the efforts and tone of the president
would in fact in action be one of encouraging bi-partisan efforts
in the legislature.  So the president would make efforts to
bring the parties together from the top while the electorate
is working to bring the parties together at the bottom.

Now some would suggest that the gives the president in fact too
much power.....  Well, perhaps that is true but would also I
suggest limit the amount of mischievous or counter-productive
behaviors in which a president would effectively be able to
engage in.

Finally, I think this would also create a more secure process
for the selection of a U.S. president and even should logically
be less expensive.  I think it would also create a more positive
atmosphere in politics generally, and finally I believe, create
a social culture better able to serve  effective problem solving.